Melike Altınışık, a renowned Turkish architect, offers a critical perspective on parametricism, a style of architecture that has significantly influenced the field. She argues that while parametricism has positively impacted the direction of architecture, the idea of making it the universal style is misguided. In an interview, Altınışık emphasizes that computational tools, while potentially universal, should not dictate the future of architecture. She believes that in a globalized world, architecture risks becoming visually homogenized, which is a concern she shares with many in the field.
The concept of parametricism, formalized in 2008 by Zaha Hadid Architects' principal, Patrik Schumacher, is characterized by the use of parametric design tools, resulting in bold and fluid forms. However, Altınışık challenges the notion that parametricism should be the universal style, advocating instead for its use in creating contextually intelligent architecture. She argues that computational methods should enhance diversity rather than uniformity, as the strength of algorithmic thinking lies in its ability to respond to context.
Altınışık's own work, through Melike Altınışık Architects (MAA), reflects this approach. She emphasizes that her buildings are designed as part of a wider environmental, social, and technological system, integrating nature, technology, and human experience into coherent architectural systems. This approach, she explains, began during her time as a student at the Architectural Association (AA) and evolved during her work with Zaha Hadid, where she learned to master complexity rather than simplify it.
Despite her reservations about parametricism as a universal style, Altınışık acknowledges its influence on her generation of architects. She believes that parametricism has shifted the focus from object-making to system-thinking, introducing rule-based design, adaptability, and the idea that geometry can emerge from performance criteria. However, she emphasizes that the real transformation was epistemological rather than aesthetic, changing how architects think and work.
Looking ahead, Altınışık hopes that parametricism can prevent architecture from becoming homogenous and that this message should be taught in architecture schools. She advocates for a balanced approach, where students learn both traditional and digital tools, ensuring that they do not prioritize tools over thinking. She believes that the architect of the future must be fluent in both material craft and algorithmic logic, combining traditional skills with digital proficiency.
In conclusion, Melike Altınışık's perspective on parametricism highlights the importance of context, diversity, and a balanced approach to architectural education. Her work and ideas contribute to a broader discussion on the future of architecture, challenging the notion of a universal style and emphasizing the need for a nuanced understanding of computational methods in design.
